Specific frameworks can be useful for different subject areas. This section introduces some of the most common.
Not sure which one to use, or if you need to do this? Then speak to your Supervisor, Academic Mentor or Academic Librarian.
CHIP is a framework that can be used in psychology / counselling.
It stands for:
C = Context (What is the social, cultural or geographical context of your research?)
H = How (What research methods are you using?)
I = Issues (Which behaviours or experience are you examining?)
P = Population (How are you defining the population you are researching?)
For example:
C = Friendship groups at university
H = Questionnaires and interviews (Qualitative methods)
I = Meaning of friendship; development of friendship groups; the ways that friends socialise.
P = Students at universities in the UK
CIMO is a framework often used in business research.
It stands for:
C = Context (Which individuals, groups, systems or relationships are you exploring?)
I = Intervention (Which event, action or activity are you investigating?)
M = Mechanism (What explains how the intervention leads to the outcome? Which circumstances cause these responses? What prevents the intervention from achieving the outcome?)
O = Outcome (Which effects of the intervention are you focusing on? How are you defining and measuring these?)
An 'S' (study design) or a 'T' (time) can be added to this framework.
PICO is a framework that is often used in health related research.
It stands for:
P = population / patient
I = intervention
C = comparison (which is often implied)
O = outcome
For example:
In infants in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), does cup feeding throughout the hospital stay lead to greater success with breastfeeding post-discharge when compared to tube feedings? (Question by University of Kansas Medical Center, 2021)
P: Infants in NICU
I: Cup feeding throughout the hospital stay
C: Tube feedings throughout the hospital stay
O: Greater reported success with breastfeeding post hospital discharge
A T (time) can be added to this framework to make PICOT. The framework can also be adjusted to be specifically quantitative or qualitative:
PICOT quantitative (Higgins et al., 2019)
P = population
I = intervention
C = comparison
O = outcome
T = time
PICOT qualitative (Fineout-Overholt and Johnston, 2005)
P = population
I = issue
C = context
O = outcome
T = time
OVID PICO tool
Additional framework examples:
SPICE (Cooke et al., 2012) is a general framework that could be used in research projects examining policies, services and experiences. There is no specific subject area that SPICE could be applied to.
S = setting (Where is it taking place?)
P = population / patient (Whose perspective is being looked at? How is the population defined?)
I = intervention (How is the issue being dealt with?)
C = control / comparison (What alternative methods are available?)
E = evaluation (How was success measured? What needs to be measured?)
SPIDER (Cooke et al., 2012) helps researchers evaluate experiences of specific phenomena. Again, this could be applied in any subject area.
S = sample (Who are the participants?)
P = phenomena of Interest (What is the issue you want to find out the participants' attitudes to?)
D = design (What type of study is being carried out?)
E = evaluation (Which results are being focused on and how are they being measured?)
R = research type (Qualitative, quantitative or mixed-methods research?)
The image below shows the SPIDER framework in visual form. It is a spider web with 5 points, each point indicating a letter of the framework: Sample; Phenomenon of Interest; Design; Evaluation and Research type.
![diagram of the SPIDER research framework](https://libapps-eu.s3.amazonaws.com/accounts/2773/images/SPIDER.jpeg)
Image from:
Cooke A, Smith D, and Booth A. (2012) 'Beyond PICO: The SPIDER Tool for Qualitative Evidence Synthesis', Qualitative Health Research, 22(10) pp.1435-1443. Available at: doi:10.1177/1049732312452938
FURTHER READING
These resources offer further reading on the use of research frameworks: